I had 2 Atomic CLRs before we moved. They were outstanding. If I were to buy a similar speaker now, it would be an
Posts by Dlaut
-
-
Please let us know what you think. I’ve had great luck with my CLR NEO, But always lookin for something better
I have used the Clr in the past and loved the way the rigs translated to the FOH. I have sold them since we've moved to a smaller house in retirement. I am going to try tweeking on studio monitors and see how that goes.
The guy I sold them to has used them for stage monitoring, as well as FOH for small venues.
-
Yeah, I did the PRS locking tuners, they popped up under the guitars picture when I was placing the order, so I just clicked and added them. I know they work well, at least according to a couple of people I know who have had them.
I looked at Kluson tuners from your link, those are like the tuners on my Cutlass, and I really like them. I hope I feel the same about the functionality of the PRS style tuners, only time will tell, but I do prefer the look of the Kluson.
Paul Reed Smith makes their own tuners because he feels that adding mass to the headstock negatively affects guitar tone and sustain. His designs have evolved over the years and work extremely well.
-
I may have misspoken a bit. I don't believe that it's the bandwidth of of cable itself. CAT5 has a bandwidth of 10/100 Mbps @100 MHZ. I *think* that the cable was just a convenient, readily available interconnection method.
I believe that the timing issue is hardware related. As far sighted as CK was, I think the clamor for, and programming consequences of instant switching was unforseen. Having said that, I would far rather have instant switching....but, both would be nice.
Just out of curiosity, does the Kemper Stage tempo light work correctly? If so, my hardware theory may be supported.
-
I have no technical knowledge, and this is just a wild a$$ guess. Could it be a bandwidth issue due to other communications over the CAT5 interface having priority, and thus the tempo signal - which has to be sent, continuously, from the profiler - gets interrupted to allow for more instantaneous responses for other functions?
I have owned my Kemper since the beginning. I received the foot controller very early in the first batch. At that time, the light worked as expected.
Simultaneously, there was a big push for instantaneous rig changes within a performance. In retrospect, it seems that the synchronization of the tap tempo light was a casualty of instant switching.
If the forgoing is accurate, we may never get the tempo light fixed with the current hardware.
-
Perhaps you should consider holding your guitar with a different part of your anatomy? 😳😂
-
I currently (since 2013) have the profiler head and floorboard. I am considering getting a stage. If I backup the Head (it's an older OS), can I restore it to the Stage and keep all of my performances, rigs, morphs, clean sense, and output EQ settings?
What won't transfer?
Thanks in advance.
-
-
-
-
Anybody?
I've been expecting dual rig capability for about 5 years. CK mentioned that all of the rigs in a performance are constantly kept in memory - hence the virtually instantaneous switching between rigs.
My reasoning is that since the rigs are already in memory, morphing between them should be very doable.
Please CK, bring it it on! 😊
-
Great idea! I like it!
-
I'll continue to predict that we will eventually get the ability to morph between 2 rigs or at least amps. It will require no more memory, as all of the rigs in a performance are already in memory so that the switching is near instantaneous.
-
Display More
Hi guys,
When we discuss "switching lags", we have to make a distiction between the time the transition takes, and a possible sound pause.
When you switch Rigs inside the same Performance, the reaction time will only be a handful of milliseconds.
There will be no sound pause or gap, because both rigs will be crossfaded. This is quite a unique feature in digital guitar amps.
The crossfade, however, might give you the impression of a lag.
You can control the crossfade time by the parameter "Rig X-Fade Time" in the System Menu.
The lower you set it, the faster and harder is the sound transition.
So, since there is already a crossfade between rigs in the same performance, when can we expect to see Morphing between rigs in the same performance? It sounds like a variable crossfade time parameter assigned to the morph position of a footswitch, or a morph pedal should be easily achievable? ?
-
Here's a point for consideration:
The newly announced Windows 11 will include Android support. It isn't a niche, amateur or narrow product anymore.
-
Don't all those adverts scrolling across the screen and the interruptions to your playing for those "messages from our sponsors" drive you nuts?
Actually, those don't bother me as much as ones telling me that "Your car's warranty is expiring soon...."
-
I have good reason to believe that morphing between 2 different profiles is absolutely possible. I will be highly surprised if we don't get it within the next year.
-
Know something we don't?
Heh. Always.
-
Short answer; you could be right, you could be wrong I really don’t know enough about what goes on under the hood to know if it is technically possible but it seems unlike.
long answer: as ckemper and Burkhard are fond of saying “what problem would it solve?” The difficulty I would foresee is how to morph between two amp blocks that need to occupy the same slot simultaneously in order to morph smoothly between them. I don’t believe this is currently possible with the hardware (but who knows except the developers). Therefore, if you can’t morph the amp blocks all that would be possible would be to morph between the FX in each rig. However, in the vast majority of cases I would think that could be achieved with the current morph features within the same rig slot.
Am I missing something? Or is that bear going to be heading my way ?Hopefully no bears are heading your way. If so, I don't have to run faster than it, I just have to get past you.
Time will tell......
-
i predict it won’t ?
seriously though, it don’t think it is possible with the current hardware as it would presumably need the ability to have both slots (therefore two rigs) loaded simultaneously. If the hardware was capable of that there would be nothing to stop dual amp rigs either.Dual amp rigs are a little different, as they would both have to occupy the same memory slot (I suppose).
Morphing between two performance slots should be much easier (apart from the coding) since both rigs are already in memory - which is why the switching between rigs in a performance is virtually instantaneous.
We already have delay spillover from slot-to-slot, so there is currently some cross-pollination now....just saying.
I'll bet you a beer on it.
